Rankings / Routes / Los Angeles to Seattle
2025 flightsLos Angeles to Seattle
Between Los Angeles and Seattle, 3.7 million passengers flew nonstop in 2025, on 31 thousand flights of about 959 miles and 2.2 hours in the air. The average passenger accounted for about 151 kg of CO2 from the fuel burned, from 108 kg on Frontier Airlines to 239 kg on SkyWest Airlines.
Alaska carries 63% of the passengers between Los Angeles and Seattle, the same share as in 2019, so the route's 151 kg per passenger is mostly Alaska's number: 138 kg, down from 149 kg in 2019. Delta went the other way, from 154 kg to 165 kg.
The regional flights are the weak spot. SkyWest carries 7% of passengers now, up from 2%, on 71-seat jets at 239 kg, 73% above Alaska's mainline jets and more than twice Frontier's 108 kg.
- 151 kgCO2 per passenger, average
- 959 milesabout 2.2 hours in the air
- 3.7 millionpassengers in 2025
- 81%of seats filled
CO2 per passenger, airline by airline
Los Angeles to Seattle by airline, 2025
| Airline | Share of passengers | Flights (thousands) | Main aircraft | Seats per flight | Seats filled | kg CO2 per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska Airlines | 63% | 17.2 | Boeing 737-800, Boeing 737-900ER | 168 | 82% | 138 |
| Delta Air Lines | 20% | 6.4 | Boeing 737-800 | 152 | 77% | 165 |
| SkyWest Airlines | 7% | 4.7 | Embraer 175 | 71 | 82% | 239 |
| Frontier Airlines | 4% | 1.0 | Airbus A320neo, Airbus A321neo | 196 | 85% | 108 |
| United Airlines | 4% | 1.2 | Airbus A320-200, Boeing 737 MAX 8 | 163 | 73% | 167 |
What explains the differences
It's number 14 of the 100 busiest city pairs by passengers, and number 55 for the lowest CO2 per mile flown (0.16 kg per passenger-mile, number 1 being the lowest). A typical route of 959 miles in this set comes out at about 146 kg, so this one is close to that.
The flights use more than one pair of airports: SEA to LAX (49%), SEA to SNA (24%), SEA to ONT (16%). The figures here cover all of them.
The airlines on this route differ by 120% per passenger. Frontier Airlines burned 1,840 gallons per flight and 166 passengers on each, and SkyWest Airlines 1,424 gallons and 58 passengers. The gap comes from how many passengers share each flight, not from fuel burned per flight. Frontier Airlines flew 85% full here against 82% for SkyWest Airlines, flying mostly Airbus A320neo against Embraer 175.
For comparison, the EPA default factor for a flight of this length (0.129 kg per passenger-mile) would give 124 kg. The EPA figure is a national average for flights of that length. The measured figure for this route is 22% higher.
2019 compared with 2025
In 2019 the route carried 4.2 million passengers on 36 thousand flights. In 2025 it carried 3.7 million, down 11%, on 31 thousand flights, down 14%. The average flight had 141 seats then and 150 now, and 83% of them were filled against 81%.
CO2 per passenger was 161 kg in 2019 and 151 kg in 2025, down 6.6%. Fuel burned per flight was down 3.2% (1,937 gallons to 1,874) and passengers per flight were up 3.6% (117 to 121). The distance flown was about the same (959 miles then, 959 now).
Alaska Airlines led in both years, with 63% of passengers in 2019 and 63% in 2025. SkyWest Airlines gained the most share, 2% to 7%. Frontier Airlines and United Airlines didn't have 1% of the passengers in 2019 and now together carry 8%. Compass Airlines and JetBlue and Horizon Air no longer reach 1% of passengers, having had 15% in 2019.
Airline by airline, Alaska Airlines went from 149 kg to 138 kg per passenger (161 seats per flight to 168, main aircraft Boeing 737-800 in both years); Delta Air Lines went from 154 kg to 165 kg per passenger (168 seats per flight to 152, main aircraft Boeing 737-900ER then and Boeing 737-800 now).
The airports changed too: SEA to LAX handled 59% of the passengers in 2019 and 49% in 2025.
Los Angeles to Seattle, 2019 and 2025
| Measure | 2019 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Passengers (thousands) | 4,215 | 3,746 |
| Flights (thousands) | 36.0 | 30.9 |
| Seats filled | 83% | 81% |
| Gallons of fuel per flight | 1,937 | 1,874 |
| kg CO2 per passenger | 161 | 151 |
Los Angeles to Seattle and back: time in the air
Flights from Los Angeles to Seattle spent 137 minutes in the air on average in 2025, against 131 minutes from Seattle to Los Angeles: 7 minutes longer, 5% more. The route runs mostly north to south, so the winds on the day, routing and congestion decide the difference.
At this route's average burn of about 840 gallons per flight hour, those extra minutes cost about 97 gallons per flight, which is about 0.8 gallons or 8 kg of CO2 for each passenger on the slower direction. The route figure above averages both directions.
Time in the air by direction, 2025
| Direction | Average minutes in the air | Flights |
|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles to Seattle | 137.4 | 15,419 |
| Seattle to Los Angeles | 130.5 | 15,460 |
Fly or drive
Driving is about 1,122 miles by road, which we estimate as 1.17 times the straight-line distance. An average car emits about 333 kg of CO2 on the trip, at the EPA figure of 0.297 kg per vehicle-mile. Alone, that's 121% more than the 151 kg for a passenger on the flight.
With 3 people in the car, driving comes out lower per person than the flight (111 kg each, and 83 kg each for four). A larger SUV or pickup (0.394 kg per mile) would emit about 442 kg per vehicle.
Flights are listed under the airline that operates them, so regional flying appears under the regional. How the CO2 and drive figures are worked out is in the methodology.
What to take from it
The whole route is 7% cleaner per passenger than in 2019, 151 kg against 161 kg, while carrying 11% fewer people.
Half of the 'Los Angeles' passengers, 52%, don't use LAX, and with 1,122 road miles to Seattle a car of three would produce 111 kg each, 26% below the flight. The flight itself is about 134 minutes in the air.
Routes with shared cities or nearby CO2 per mile
Airports on this route: Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Los Angeles International Airport, John Wayne Airport, Ontario International Airport, Hollywood Burbank Airport.
Airport and airline references
- Wikipedia: Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
- Wikipedia: Los Angeles International Airport
- Wikipedia: John Wayne Airport
- Wikipedia: Ontario International Airport
- Wikipedia: Hollywood Burbank Airport
- Wikipedia: Alaska Airlines
- Official site: Alaska Airlines
- Wikipedia: Delta Air Lines
- Official site: Delta Air Lines
- Wikipedia: SkyWest Airlines
- Official site: SkyWest Airlines
- Wikipedia: Frontier Airlines
- Official site: Frontier Airlines
- Wikipedia: United Airlines
- Official site: United Airlines
Source: US Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), T-100 traffic and Schedule T-2 fuel filings; US EPA transport emission factors. See the methodology.
See all routes, or how the airlines compare overall on the airline pages.